Change this.
There's been a lot of talk in the pundit universe and surrounding blogosphere about cabinet appointments. I suppose that's the kind of news I should expect to hear between now and January 20, aside from reports on the continuing economic disaster, now rivaling Iraq as Bush's biggest fuckup ever (if not in lives, certainly in dollars lost). For my own part, I'll reserve judgment until more of the Obama administration is in place. I'd like to spend this longish constitutional intermission between election day and inauguration day talking about the issues that I think should be a priority for the new regime. Not that they will listen, but... here it comes, Mr. President-Elect.
This week, foreign policy.
The Congo War. This is the deadliest conflict since World War II (unless, perhaps, you roll all of the Indochina wars together), and it has gotten very little attention in our national media. This is pretty typical treatment for sub-Saharan Africa, but honestly... more than 5 million people have died over the past 10 years, and it's still going. The war is often portrayed as impossibly complex and abstruse, but at its root are some very comprehensible motivations. The D.R. of Congo is a Western Europe-sized treasure house of mineral wealth, holding most of the world's cobalt, as well as massive deposits of coltan and other materials necessary for the maintenance of our 21st-Century technology-obsessed consumer lifestyles. Whoever is doing the actually killing and mass rape at any given time - renegade Rwandan generals or Congolese government troops - these minerals continue to flow into our insatiable industrial economies, just as they did during Mobutu's and King Leopold's times. Seems to me that Obama's foreign policy team could do worse than to make this war a priority, even if it isn't costing U.S. lives. They could start by dropping the idiotic idea of creating an Africa Command for our military and taking a good hard look at U.S. companies - like Freeport McMoran - who do business in the Congo.
Israel - Palestine. The conflict in Israel-Palestine has run through eleven presidencies without resolution. Will Obama's be the twelfth? I'm not sanguine about the prospects for an equitable resolution with Rahm Emmanuel, Dennis Ross, and Martin Indyk at the O-man's ear. One can only hope that the President-Elect is smart enough and compassionate enough to recognize that what the Israeli government is doing right now, particularly in Gaza, constitutes a serious crime against humanity. There is only one obvious solution to this conflict and it's based on the pre-June 1967 borders. Everyone knows this to be true, but we are frozen in the stalemate established by Nixon, Kissinger, and the Israeli government more than three decades ago. At the very least, Obama needs to apply some pressure to Tel Aviv to take the thumb screws off of those many thousands of families struggling to survive in Gaza, the world's largest open-air prison. Something like this can only happen if people across our nation make their voices heard in support of that imprisoned population.
I've got more, but I'll stop. Obama's got a lot on his plate right now - don't want to burn the guy out this early. Tune in next week, Barack-o. I'm just getting warmed up.
luv u,
jp
Comments