Cave, baby, cave.
This will be a brief one, again. Hands full, head empty. Kind of sleepy, actually, so watch the prose - it may falter badly. No guarantees.
Obama's plan to open up off-shore drilling along much of our national coastline resembles some of the graphics I've been seeing in BP commercials lately. I guess all it takes is a little public diplomacy by the enormous oil and gas industry groups, and this administration will bend back at the knees. No, it's not the worst possible plan for extraction of fossil fuels, but it is a major wedge in the door towards the same "drill, baby, drill" Obama's presidential campaign opponent advocated. Can't believe they won't pry that door even further open in the near future.
Where are people at on this issue? As mentioned above, they have been bombarded with television ads
like no other time I can recall. America's Oil and Gas Industry, Chevron, BP, and others, all trying to outdo one another with how dedicated they are to creating jobs, saving the environment, finding "solutions", raising families, promoting public investment .... everything except generating massive profits, which is what they are ACTUALLY doing. I can't imagine that, with all this promotional bullshit running on every channel, people aren't getting more cozy with the idea of "drill, baby, drill". (Sure, they always mention a full menu of energy options, including renewables, conservation, and others. But you and I both know they're talking oil and gas.)
The energy sector is putting its unprecedented amounts of cash to good use, I can see. So are many other corporate players - many I've never seen do advertising before. The banks, of course, are saving the world, according to their ads. Then you've got the defense contractors, like Boeing, waxing poetic on the air. And, strangely, companies like Siemen's, Cisco, etc., vying for position in the new "clean" energy bonanza, the new network technology frontier. So why is Obama unilaterally disarming on fossil fuels? He doesn't think he is, that's why. But in effect, that's what's happening.
I don't know - it's a zig-zag path between moderate and conservative, as far as I can see, just like Clinton. Just wish the zigs went a little farther. (Wishing won't do, of course.)
luv u,
jp
Obama's plan to open up off-shore drilling along much of our national coastline resembles some of the graphics I've been seeing in BP commercials lately. I guess all it takes is a little public diplomacy by the enormous oil and gas industry groups, and this administration will bend back at the knees. No, it's not the worst possible plan for extraction of fossil fuels, but it is a major wedge in the door towards the same "drill, baby, drill" Obama's presidential campaign opponent advocated. Can't believe they won't pry that door even further open in the near future.
Where are people at on this issue? As mentioned above, they have been bombarded with television ads
like no other time I can recall. America's Oil and Gas Industry, Chevron, BP, and others, all trying to outdo one another with how dedicated they are to creating jobs, saving the environment, finding "solutions", raising families, promoting public investment .... everything except generating massive profits, which is what they are ACTUALLY doing. I can't imagine that, with all this promotional bullshit running on every channel, people aren't getting more cozy with the idea of "drill, baby, drill". (Sure, they always mention a full menu of energy options, including renewables, conservation, and others. But you and I both know they're talking oil and gas.)The energy sector is putting its unprecedented amounts of cash to good use, I can see. So are many other corporate players - many I've never seen do advertising before. The banks, of course, are saving the world, according to their ads. Then you've got the defense contractors, like Boeing, waxing poetic on the air. And, strangely, companies like Siemen's, Cisco, etc., vying for position in the new "clean" energy bonanza, the new network technology frontier. So why is Obama unilaterally disarming on fossil fuels? He doesn't think he is, that's why. But in effect, that's what's happening.
I don't know - it's a zig-zag path between moderate and conservative, as far as I can see, just like Clinton. Just wish the zigs went a little farther. (Wishing won't do, of course.)
luv u,
jp
Comments