Winding it down.
Obama announced his plans to reverse the Afghan "surge" over the next year and a half - news that appears to have pleased no one in the political world. I guess he shares the Alan Simpson belief that if you piss everyone - everyone - off, you must be doing something right. It just makes me wonder if the guy ever considered trying to please somebody, sometime. A very typical Obama approach, this withdrawal strategy - right down the muddle in the middle. It's a lot like his solution to health care reform, Wall Street reform, etc. Basically half-measures where double-sized efforts are necessary. Putting a bandaid on a compound fracture. Cured!
This line kind of sums up my own personal frustration with the president:
"Thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only
leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. "The message," he said, "is we don't forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes."
Yep, well... that memory / accountability argument is a bit flawed. When it comes to our own bona fide war criminals - people who smashed a country to pieces, killing hundreds of thousands, causing millions of refugees, many of whom will never again see home, etc., we need to "look forward" and not engage in settling scores. Theirs? They pay. Bin Laden had much, much to answer for, no question. But so do George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, Douglas Feith, and others in the last administration. They cooked up a case for a war that killed more Americans than Bin Laden killed on 9/11. So what if it looks politically awkward; did they do it or not? If they did the crime, they should do the time. It's a venerable conservative position.
Of course, Obama's got blood on his hands now, as well. In politics there's an old saying about not breaking the other guys' rice bowl. With someone as cautious as this president, rice bowls have never been safer.
luv u,
jp
This line kind of sums up my own personal frustration with the president:
"Thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only
leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. "The message," he said, "is we don't forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes."Yep, well... that memory / accountability argument is a bit flawed. When it comes to our own bona fide war criminals - people who smashed a country to pieces, killing hundreds of thousands, causing millions of refugees, many of whom will never again see home, etc., we need to "look forward" and not engage in settling scores. Theirs? They pay. Bin Laden had much, much to answer for, no question. But so do George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, Douglas Feith, and others in the last administration. They cooked up a case for a war that killed more Americans than Bin Laden killed on 9/11. So what if it looks politically awkward; did they do it or not? If they did the crime, they should do the time. It's a venerable conservative position.
Of course, Obama's got blood on his hands now, as well. In politics there's an old saying about not breaking the other guys' rice bowl. With someone as cautious as this president, rice bowls have never been safer.
luv u,
jp
Comments