It ain't broke.
Not that this is all that unusual, but I heard from various representatives of the Republican party and the "tea party" movement on NPR this morning. I really wonder why these right-wing types are so critical of NPR - the network is almost wholly devoted to providing them with outsized coverage. Every time they sneeze, Steve Inskeep is holding the rag. Sure, I listen to them regularly, because they have some good reporters, some good programs, and because they're better than everything else on my upstate New York radio dial. But that's a bit like voting for Barack Obama over Mitt Romney. Yeah, Barry's a pretty lousy president; he's just better by an order of magnitude than the object he was running against. Pretty low bar, frankly.
What irks me, though, is the legitimization of truly extremist right-wing notions of governance (or lack of same) through what I'm sure NPR and other networks consider "balance coverage". A brief example: yesterday there was a report on some research having to do with economic inequality and the degree to which people believe the federal government has an active role to play in addressing its effects. It was presented in the usual "this side thinks this, while the other thinks this" manner; specifically, 90% of Democrats believe the government should be involved in fighting inequality, while Republicans are evenly split. This was played as reinforcing the notion of a nation divided along party lines, but they buried the lead - by these percentages, it looks like a significant majority ... maybe 60 -70% - agree that the government has an active role to play. Why the hell isn't that the story?
The only reason why extremist tea party-type ideas significantly influence national policy is that they have an outsized voice in the national conversation. That's why we are essentially cutting the long-term unemployed off at the knees, canceling their unemployment when there's still three job seekers for every available job, slashing food stamps while cutting taxes on corporations and throwing more money at the Pentagon. Large numbers of unemployed people are a necessary component of capitalism - that keeps labor inexpensive and profits high. So to the free market fundamentalist, that system is not broken ... it's working just fine. And that is the point of view that will continue to drive the national conversation until, along with the tea party, Occupy Wall Street gets their own response to the State of the Union.
Color me disgusted.
luv u,
jp
What irks me, though, is the legitimization of truly extremist right-wing notions of governance (or lack of same) through what I'm sure NPR and other networks consider "balance coverage". A brief example: yesterday there was a report on some research having to do with economic inequality and the degree to which people believe the federal government has an active role to play in addressing its effects. It was presented in the usual "this side thinks this, while the other thinks this" manner; specifically, 90% of Democrats believe the government should be involved in fighting inequality, while Republicans are evenly split. This was played as reinforcing the notion of a nation divided along party lines, but they buried the lead - by these percentages, it looks like a significant majority ... maybe 60 -70% - agree that the government has an active role to play. Why the hell isn't that the story?
The only reason why extremist tea party-type ideas significantly influence national policy is that they have an outsized voice in the national conversation. That's why we are essentially cutting the long-term unemployed off at the knees, canceling their unemployment when there's still three job seekers for every available job, slashing food stamps while cutting taxes on corporations and throwing more money at the Pentagon. Large numbers of unemployed people are a necessary component of capitalism - that keeps labor inexpensive and profits high. So to the free market fundamentalist, that system is not broken ... it's working just fine. And that is the point of view that will continue to drive the national conversation until, along with the tea party, Occupy Wall Street gets their own response to the State of the Union.
Color me disgusted.
luv u,
jp
Comments