On accountability.
I suppose I'm old enough to grumble about stuff I can't control. And right now I'm irritated enough to take a personal swipe at some of the old white men running the country from their comfy chairs in the United States Congress. But rather than sound like John McCain, I'm going to limit myself to saying that the Senate confirmation hearing for Chuck Hagel was pretty disgraceful for a variety of reasons, not least of which is the simple fact that the man was being criticized for the high points in his career - the stuff he got right, for chrissake. The Republicans on the panel hate their old colleague because he's not bug-fuck nuts enough.
See, this is what happens when you don't hold people accountable. If someone had paid some kind of price for driving us into the Iraq war, maybe John McCain and others wouldn't feel so confident about grilling Hagel on a marginal point like the "surge" strategy.
Even by their reading of it as being an indisputable success (which killed about 1,200 Americans, b.t.w.), it could only possibly be seen as a minor corrective to one of the most heinous strategic blunders in the history of the American empire, as well as a major international crime of aggression that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and massive displacement. If Hagel was against the "surge", it's only because their war had gone so badly and that they had proven themselves incapable of managing the conflict.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not a huge fan of Hagel. He did the right thing by being outspoken about the war in the middle of the last decade, and I respected him greatly for it. But he will no doubt be a reliable steward of the imperial project, just as Obama has proven himself to be. People have short memories - not so very long ago, when Bush II was in his prime, American power was shaken to its very foundation by their insane foreign policy gambles. McCain himself was right on board with it all. It has taken years to emerge from the hole they dug us into, and yet because they haven't been held accountable, they behave as though they were right all along. Again ... disgraceful.
So, who's more bug-fuck nuts, McCain or the yargle-bargle caucus in the House? The answer may surprise you.
luv u,
jp
See, this is what happens when you don't hold people accountable. If someone had paid some kind of price for driving us into the Iraq war, maybe John McCain and others wouldn't feel so confident about grilling Hagel on a marginal point like the "surge" strategy.
Even by their reading of it as being an indisputable success (which killed about 1,200 Americans, b.t.w.), it could only possibly be seen as a minor corrective to one of the most heinous strategic blunders in the history of the American empire, as well as a major international crime of aggression that resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and massive displacement. If Hagel was against the "surge", it's only because their war had gone so badly and that they had proven themselves incapable of managing the conflict.Don't get me wrong - I'm not a huge fan of Hagel. He did the right thing by being outspoken about the war in the middle of the last decade, and I respected him greatly for it. But he will no doubt be a reliable steward of the imperial project, just as Obama has proven himself to be. People have short memories - not so very long ago, when Bush II was in his prime, American power was shaken to its very foundation by their insane foreign policy gambles. McCain himself was right on board with it all. It has taken years to emerge from the hole they dug us into, and yet because they haven't been held accountable, they behave as though they were right all along. Again ... disgraceful.
So, who's more bug-fuck nuts, McCain or the yargle-bargle caucus in the House? The answer may surprise you.
luv u,
jp
Comments